Central
banks were at it again - and markets loved it.
Last week, European
Central Bank (ECB) President Mario Draghi surprised markets when he indicated
the ECB's governing council was considering cutting interest rates and engaging
in another round of quantitative easing. The Economist explained European
monetary policy was heavily tilted toward growth before the announcement:
"The ECB is already
delivering a hefty stimulus to the Euro area, following decisions taken between
June 2014 and early 2015. It has introduced a negative interest rate, of minus
0.2%, which is charged on deposits left by banks with the ECB. It has also been
providing ultra-cheap, long-term funding to banks provided that they improve
their lending record to the private sector. And, most important of all, in January
it announced a full-blooded program of quantitative easing (QE) - creating
money to buy financial assets - which got under way in March with purchases of
€60 billion ($68 billion) of mainly public debt each month until at least
September 2016."
Despite these hefty
measures, recovery in the Euro area has been anemic, and deflation remains a
significant issue. According to Draghi, Euro area QE is expected to continue
until there is "a sustained adjustment in the path of inflation."
Europe is shooting for 2 percent inflation, just like the United States.
The People's Bank of
China (PBOC) eased monetary policy last week, too. On Monday, data showed the
Chinese economy grew by 6.9 percent during the third quarter, year-over-year.
Projections for future growth remain muted, according to BloombergBusiness. On Friday, the PBOC
indicated it was cutting interest rates for the sixth time in 12 months.
U.S. markets thrilled to
the news. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, Standard & Poor's 500 Index,
and NASDAQ were all up more than 2 percent for the week. Many global markets
delivered positive returns for the week, as well.
IT'S
IMPORTANT TO ASK THE RIGHT QUESTIONS.
A recent article in The Economist examined the
"gig" economy. You know, people selling crafts online, offering their
services as taxi drivers, renting their cars and spare bedrooms for short
periods. Some folks even rent space on their driveways to commuters. It's that
old American ingenuity and, as it turns out, it's difficult to quantify.
Analysts expected this
employment revolution to be reflected in self-employment statistics. However,
the self-employment rate in the United States has declined during the past two
decades, according to Pew Research.
Why would
self-employment be falling when more people appear to be offering services
independently? The Wall Street Journal suggested several
possibilities: 1) The gig model might not be prevalent even though some
headline-grabbing companies rely on it; 2) It's possible gig companies operate
in industries that have always depended on independent contractors; or 3)
people who do this work may report they are employees of the firms they work
for rather than independent contractors.
The Economist concurred with the
last, suggesting that people do not consider their gigs to be work. If that's
the case, then governments may not be asking the right questions when they try
to assess the situation. A British survey that focused its queries on
alternative employment found that about 6 percent of respondents participated
in the gig economy.
Does it matter? Should
anyone be concerned the dimensions of this segment of the economy are
relatively unknown? The Economist suggests it is important:
"Measuring the gig
economy matters. To get a clear picture on living standards, you need to
understand how people combine jobs, work, and other activities to create
income. And, this gets to the crucial question of whether the gig economy
represents a positive or negative development for workers. All this makes it
important for official agencies to have a go at measuring it."
What's the solution? The Wall Street Journal suggested the U.S.
Congress might want to reconsider funding the U.S. survey of Contingent and
Alternative Employment Arrangements. The last time it was conducted was 2005.
Weekly
Focus - Think About It
"The function of
education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically.
Intelligence plus character - that is the goal of true education."
--Martin Luther King, Jr.,
Civil rights activist
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.